Research Article

Narrative Discourse in Persian-speaking Patients With Multiple Sclerosis


Introduction: Narrative discourse is a crucial subset of discourse production that can be used to assess high levels of language processing like microlinguistic and macrolinguistic structures. Because patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have more problems at high levels of language processing, this study aims to analyze narrative discourse in MS patients and compare it with healthy people.
Materials and Methods: This research was a descriptive-analytic study. The study participants included 15 patients with MS and 15 healthy controls matched for age and education level. For investigating the narrative discourse, we used the Persian Narrative Discourse Test (PNDT). Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and the independent t-test in SPSS-24.
Results: The mean values of syntactic complexity, verbal error ratio, cohesion ratio, and coherence in Persian-speaking patients with MS were 1.40, 0.42, 1.18, 2.32, respectively. Our findings indicated that regarding the macrolinguistic measures, there is a significant difference between MS patients and healthy subjects (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the microlinguistic measures (P>0.05).
Conclusion: This study showed that narrative discourse analysis could help identify linguistic and communication problems in MS patients. Patients with MS had pragmatic language disorder.

Filippi M, Rocca MA, Horsfield MA, Hametner S, Geurts JJ, Comi G, et al. Imaging cortical damage and dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurology. 2013; 70(5):556-64. [DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1954] [PMID]

Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis-a review. European Journal of Neurology. 2019; 26(1):27-40. [DOI:10.1111/ene.13819] [PMID]

Filippi M, Brück W, Chard D, Fazekas F, Geurts JJ, Enzinger C, et al. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2019; 18(2):198-210. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30451-4]

Azami M, YektaKooshali MH, Shohani M, Khorshidi A, Mahmudi L. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0214738. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214738] [PMID] [PMCID]

Geurts JJ, Calabrese M, Fisher E, Rudick RA. Measurement and clinical effect of grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2012; 11(12):1082-92. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70230-2]

Aghaz A, Alidad A, Hemmati E, Jadidi H, Ghelichi L. Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis and its related factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Iranian Journal of Neurology. 2018; 17(4):180-8. [DOI:10.18502/ijnl.v17i4.592] [PMID]

Lassmann H. The pathologic substrate of magnetic resonance alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2008; 18(4):563-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.nic.2008.06.005] [PMID]

Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, et al. Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Multiple Sclerosis. 2012; 18(6):891-8. [DOI:10.1177/1352458511431076] [PMID] [PMCID]

Lacour A, De Seze J, Revenco E, Lebrun C, Masmoudi K, Vidry E, et al. Acute aphasia in multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study of 22 patients. Neurology. 2004; 62(6):974-7. [DOI:10.1212/01.WNL.0000115169.23421.5D] [PMID]

Soltani M, Rahimifar P. Language disorders in multiple sclerosis. In: Baloyannis SJ. Multiple sclerosis. London: IntechOpen; 2020.

Mao-Draayer Y, Panitch H. Alexia without agraphia in multiple sclerosis: Case report with magnetic resonance imaging localization. Multiple Sclerosis . 2004; 10(6):705-7. [DOI:10.1191/1352458504ms1075cr] [PMID]

Cannizzaro MS, Coelho CA. Analysis of narrative discourse structure as an ecologically relevant measure of executive function in adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2013; 42(6):527-49. [DOI:10.1007/s10936-012-9231-5] [PMID]

Arrondo G, Sepulcre J, Duque B, Toledo J, Villoslada P. Narrative speech is impaired in multiple sclerosis. European Neurological Journal. 2010; 2(1):1-8.

Armstrong E. Discourse across disorders: Acquired neurogenic conditions. In: Armstrong E. Seminars in Speech and Language. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2012. [DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1301158]

Foka-Kavalieraki P, Kakavoulia M, Economou A, Varlokosta S, Routsis C, Kasselimis DS, et al. A comprehensive approach to the analysis of narrative discourse production by Greek speakers with aphasia. Paper presented at the Science of Aphasia IX. 20–25 September 2008; Chalkidiki, Greece.

Beytollahi S, Soleymani Z, Jalaie S. The development of a new test for consecutive assessment of narrative skills in Iranian School-Age Children. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 45(6):425-33. [PMID]

De Lira JO, Ortiz KZ, Campanha AC, Bertolucci PH, Minett TS. Microlinguistic aspects of the oral narrative in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. International Psychogeriatrics. 2011; 23(3):404-12. [DOI:10.1017/S1041610210001092] [PMID]

Marini A, Galetto V, Zampieri E, Vorano L, Zettin M, Carlomagno S. Narrative language in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(10):2904-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.017] [PMID]

Rahimifar P, Soltani M, Moradi N, Madjdinasab N, Latifi SM. [A comparative study of repetition of long sentences skill in Persian-speaking multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects (Persian)]. Koomesh. 2017; 19(1):122-8.

Friend KB, Rabin BM, Groninger L, Deluty RH, Bever C, Grattan L. Language functions in patients with multiple sclerosis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1999; 13(1):78-94. [PMID]

Feenaughty L, Tjaden K, Benedict RH, Weinstock-Guttman B. Speech and pause characteristics in multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study of speakers with high and low neuropsychological test performance. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2013; 27(2):134-51. [PMID] [PMCID]

Arnott W, Jordan F, Murdoch B, Lethlean J. Narrative discourse in multiple sclerosis: an investigation of conceptual structure. Aphasiology. 1997; 11(10):969-91.

Hampe B. Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. [DOI:10.1017/9781108182324]

Chabok SY, Kapourchali SR, Leili EK, Saberi A, Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Effective factors on linguistic disorder during acute phase following traumatic brain injury in adults. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(7):1444-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.029] [PMID]

Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Valizadeh L, Jalaie S. Validation of a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the Persian population: A pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology. 2010; 17(3):190-5. [PMID]

Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z, Yadegari F, Behrooz M-B. Persian Narrative Discourse Test. Tehran: University of Welfare & Rehabilitation Sciences Press; 2016.

Ghayoumi Anaraki Z, Marini A, Yadegari F, Mahmoodi Bakhtiari B, Fakharian E, Rahgozar M, et al. Narrative discourse impairments in Persian-speaking persons with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2014; 66(6):273-9. [DOI:10.1159/000371443] [PMID]

Lê K, Mozeiko J, Coelho C. Discourse analyses: Characterizing cognitive-communication disorders following TBI. The ASHA Leader. 2011; 16(2):18-21. [DOI:10.1044/leader.FTR4.16022011.18]

Ghayoumi Z, Yadegari F, Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari B, Fakharian E, Rahgozar M, Rasouli M. Persuasive discourse impairments in traumatic brain injury. Archives of Trauma Research. 2015; 4(1):e21473. [DOI:10.5812/atr.21473] [PMID] [PMCID]

Fiestas CE, Bedore LM, Peña ED, Nagy VJ, Cohen J, McAlister K. Use of mazes in the narrative language samples of bilingual and monolingual 4-to 7-year old children. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism; 2005: Casaedilla Press.

Halliday MAK, Hasan R. Cohesion in English. London: Routledge; 2013. [DOI:10.4324/9781315836010]

Wright HH, Capilouto GJ, Koutsoftas A. Evaluating measures of global coherence ability in stories in adults. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2013; 48(3):249-56. [DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12000] [PMID] [PMCID]

Glosser G, Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language. 1991; 40(1):67-88. [DOI:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J]

Fagan WT. The relationship of the” maze” to language planning and production. Research in the Teaching of English. 1982; 16(1):85-95.

Power E, Weir S, Richardson J, Fromm D, Forbes M, MacWhinney B, et al. Patterns of narrative discourse in early recovery following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain injury. 2020; 34(1):98-109. [PMID]

El-Wahsh S, Heard R, Bogaardt H, Kumfor F, Ballard KJ. Variables associated with self-reported language impairment in multiple sclerosis: A regression analysis. International Journal of MS Care. 2021; 23(2):85-92. [DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2020-096] [PMID] [PMCID]

Rusz J, Benova B, Ruzickova H, Novotny M, Tykalova T, Hlavnicka J, et al. Characteristics of motor speech phenotypes in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2018; 19:62-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.007] [PMID]

Soltani M, Emami Dehcheshmeh SF, Moradi N, Hajiyakhchali A, Majdinasab N, Latifi SM, et al. Comparing executive functions in bilinguals and monolinguals suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosi. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2018; 12(2):133-9.

IssueVol 16 No 1 (2022) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Multiple Sclerosis Linguistics Narration Language Pragmatic Speech

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z, Aghaz A, Ghasisin L, Shahriyari A, Hemmati E. Narrative Discourse in Persian-speaking Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. jmr. 2022;16(1):61-68.