Research Article

Selective Impairment of Verb Tense in Mazandarani-Speaking Agrammatic Patients

Abstract

Introduction: Among many grammatical problems affecting agrammatic patients, those of inflectional morphology, specifically tense, stand at the forefront. This study aimed to analyze tense properties in Mazandarani-speaking Broca patients to see which aspects of this inflectional system were more negatively affected.
Materials and Methods: Utilizing inclusion/exclusion criteria, we chose 10 patients (mean age 47 years) in this descriptive-analytical research. To select our participants, some criteria including the results of the Persian aphasia test, monolingualism, and magnetic resonance imaging reports were considered which corroborated the involvement of the anterior frontal lobe, inferior anterior parietal lobe, Perisylvian, and Broca’s areas as well as inferior frontal gyrus. To monitor our patients’ performance in three separate tenses of present (progressive), future, and past (simple past, past perfect, and past continuous), we administered written sentence completion and sentence-to-picture matching tests. To investigate whether our patients’ performance in diverse verb tenses was significantly different, we utilized Wilcoxon statistics to analyze our data.
Results: The results demonstrated a significant difference between the performance of the patients in past progressive tense compared to other tenses (P=0.02). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed between the mean responses to past tenses and present-future tenses.
Conclusion: Mazandarani-speaking agrammatic demonstrated selective poor performance in the past tense inflection. Regarding the crucial role of tense properties in verbal communication, specifically past tense, to talk about past events and memories, more attention is needed by clinicians and speech therapists to reinforce tense properties enhancing agrammatic communication capabilities.

Chomsky N. The development of grammar in child language: Formal discussion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1964; 29:35-9. [DOI:10.21236/AD0616323] [PMID]

Kean ML. Agrammatism: Edited treatise. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2008. [Link]

Lapointe SG. Some issues in the linguistic description of agrammatism. Cognition. 1983; 14(1):1-39. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90025-2] [PMID]

Druks J, Carroll E. The crucial role of tense for verb production. Brain and Language. 2005; 94(1):1-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.003] [PMID]

Stavrakaki S, Kouvava S. Functional categories in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek. Brain and Language. 2003; 86(1):129-41. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00541-2] [PMID]

Kim M, Thompson CK. Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language. 2000; 74(1):1-25. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00147-0] [PMID] [PMCID]

Lee M, Thompson CK. Agrammatic aphasic production and comprehension of unaccusative verbs in sentence contexts. J Neurolinguistics. 2004; 17(4):315-30. [DOI:10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00062-9] [PMID] [PMCID]

Caramazza A, Capasso R, Capitani E, Miceli G. Patterns of comprehension performance in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia: A test of the trace deletion hypothesis. Brain and Language. 2005; 94(1):43-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.11.006]

Kolk H. A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(3):282-303. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1049] [PMID]

Grodzinsky Y. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(1):27-51. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1039] [PMID]

Kean ML. Agrammatism: A phonological deficit? Cognition. 1979; 7(1):69-83. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(79)90012-X] [PMID]

Hagiwara H. Nonagentive predicates and agrammatic comprehension. Metropolitan Linguistics. 1993; 13:127-42. [Link]

Reznik M. Functional categories in agrammatism. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(1):117-33. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1042] [PMID]

Mitchum CC, Berndt RS. Cognitive neuropsychological approaches to diagnosing and treating language disorders: Production and comprehension of sentences. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 2001; 4:551-71. [Link]

Friedmann N, Grodzinsky Y. Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language. 1997; 56(3):397-425. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1997.1795] [PMID]

Faroqi-Shah Y, Thompson CK. Semantic, lexical, and phonological influences on the production of verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language. 2004; 89(3):484-98.[DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.006] [PMID] [PMCID]

Chomsky N. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014. [Link]

Wenzlaff M, Clahsen H. Tense and agreement in German agrammatism. Brain and Language. 2004; 89(1):57-68. [DOI:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00298-0] [PMID]

Kolk H. Disorders of syntax in aphasia: Linguistic-descriptive and processing approaches. In: Stemmer B, Whitaker HA, editors. Handbook of neurolinguistics. Cambridge: Academic Press. 1998. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012666055-5/50020-4]

Borjian H. Mazandarani: A typological survey. In: Korangy A, Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari B, edotors. Essays on typology of iranian languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; 2019. [DOI:10.1515/9783110604443-005]

Nilipour R, Pourshahbaz A, Ghoreyshi ZS. Reliability and Validity of bedside version of persian WAB (P-WAB-1). Basic and Clinical Neuroscience. 2014; 5(4):253-8. [PMID] [PMCID]

Novaes N, Braga M. Agrammatic aphasia and aspects. Brain and Language. 2005; 95(1):121-2. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.065]

Grossman M, Powers J, Ash S, McMillan C, Burkholder L, Irwin D, et al. Disruption of large-scale neural networks in non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia associated with frontotemporal degeneration pathology. Brain and Language. 2013; 127(2):106-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.005] [PMID] [PMCID]

Mehri A, Tahan Zadeh B, Jahani Y. [Use of tense in Persian agrammatic Broca's aphasia (Persian)]. Bimonthly Audiology. 2010; 19(1):78-85. [Link]

Benedet MJ, Christiansen JA, Goodglass H. A cross-linguistic study of grammatical morphology in Spanish- and English-speaking agrammatic patients. Cortex. 1998; 34(3):309-36. [DOI:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70758-5] [PMID]

Field J. Psycholinguistic. A resource book for students. London: Routledge; 2003. [Link]

Arabatzi M, Edwards S. Tense and syntactic processes in agrammatic speech. Brain and Language. 2002; 80(3):314-27. [DOI:10.1006/brln.2001.2591] [PMID]

Nilipour R. Task- specific agrammatism in a Farsi- English bilingual patient. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 1989; 4(2):243-53. [DOI:10.1016/0911-6044(89)90016-X]

Files
IssueVol 18 No 2 (2024) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v18i2.15971
Keywords
Agrammatism Morphology Language tests

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Azad O. Selective Impairment of Verb Tense in Mazandarani-Speaking Agrammatic Patients. jmr. 2024;18(2):152-161.