Research Article

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Comprehensive Constipation Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic constipation is one of the most common complaints of patients in developed countries, which affects 2 to 28% of the world’s population and alters patients’ quality of life extensively. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire.
Materials and Methods: The comprehensive constipation questionnaire was translated into Persian, and its back-translation was confirmed after evaluating the content validity ratio index (CVR) based on Lawshe table (CVR≥0.62). The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by the content validity index, followed by examining its reliability by Cronbach alpha and test-re-test reliability using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A total of 100 patients with chronic constipation completed the questionnaire.
Results: Content validity was confirmed in the range of 0.84 to 1.00, and the Cronbach alpha values in the range of 0.90-1.00 were acceptable. In this questionnaire, was ICC in the range of 0.76-0.99 which indicates a level of good to excellent reliability of the questionnaire. Also, the results of the factor analysis were confirmed at a moderate level Kaiser Meyer Olkin test (KMO>0.6) and Bartlett test (P<0.05) by extracting a 1-factor solution.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire had acceptable validity and reliability and seems to be an effective tool to evaluate patients with constipation.

Harris LA. Prevalence and ramifications of chronic constipation. Managed Care Interface. 2005; 18(8):23-30. [PMID]
Leung L, Riutta T, Kotecha J, Rosser W. Chronic constipation: An evidence-based review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2011; 24(4):436-51. [DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100272] [PMID]
Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144(1):218-38. [DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.028] [PMID] [PMCID]
Peppas G, Alexiou VG, Mourtzoukou E, Falagas ME. Epidemiology of constipation in Europe and Oceania: A systematic review. BMC Gastroenterology. 2008; 8(1):5. [DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-8-5] [PMID] [PMCID]


Zareian MA, Nejatbakhsh F, Tabarrai Arani M. [Importance and methods of treating pregnancy constipation in conventional medicine and comparison with traditional medicine (Persian)]. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2017; 19(40):19-32. [DOI:10.22038/IJOGI.2017.8444]
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1996; 39(6):681-5. [DOI:10.1007/BF02056950] [PMID]
Sharma S, Agarwal BB. Scoring systems in evaluation of constipation and obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). JIMSA. 2012; 25(1):57-9. [Link]
Degen LP, Phillips SF. How well does stool form reflect colonic transit? Journal in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 1996; 39(1):109-13. [DOI:10.1136/gut.39.1.109] [PMID] [PMCID]
Masaeli N, Kheirabadi GR, Afshar H, Daghaghzadeh H, Maracy MR, Assadolahi FD, Adibi P. Validity, reliability, and factor analysis of Persian version of quality of life questionnaire for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-QOL-34). Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2013; 18(6):492. [PMCID] [PMID]
Digesu GA, Panayi D, Kundi N, Tekkis P, Fernando R, Khullar V. Validity of the Rome III Criteria in assessing constipation in women. International Urogynecology Journal. 2010; 21(10):1185-93. [DOI:10.1007/s00192-010-1179-0] [PMID]
Mokhtare M, Soltani-Kermanshahi M, Boghratian AH, Agah S, Sheikhvatan M. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of patient assessment of constipation-quality of life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from bed to Bench. 2017; 10(4):289. [PMID] [PMCID]
Majidirad F, Hadian MR, Soleimani HA, Jalaie S, Ahadi T, Bebahani RB, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Wexner questionnaire in patients with functional constipation in an Iranian population. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench. 2021; 14(3):243. [PMCID] [PMID]
Mirbehresi P, Nikjooy A, Sarrafzadeh J, Mohsenifar H. Cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of wexner constipation scoring system. Function and Disability Journal. 2020; 3(1):17-26. [DOI:10.32598/fdj.3.128.2]
Toghiani A, Maleki I, Afshar H, Kazemian A. Translation and validation of the Farsi version of Rome III diagnostic questionnaire for the adult functional gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2016; 21. [DOI:10.4103/1735-1995.193175] [PMID] [PMCID]
Blake MR, Raker JM, Whelan K. Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2016; 44(7):693-703. [DOI:10.1111/apt.13746] [PMID]
Wojtyniak K, Szajewska H, Dziechciarz P. Translation to Polish, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Bristol stool form scale among healthcare professionals and patients. Przeglad Gastroenterologiczny. 2018; 13(1):35. [DOI:10.5114/pg.2017.70610] [PMID] [PMCID]

Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ. Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2000; 43(10):1419-26. [DOI:10.1007/BF02236639] [PMID]
Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: Design statistics and computer analysis. Philadelphia: Davis Fa; 1981. [Link]
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2007; 30(4):459-67. [DOI:10.1002/nur.20199] [PMID]
Molin AD, McMillan SC, Zenerino F, Rattone V, Grubich S, Guazzini A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Italian constipation assessment scale. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2012; 18(7):321-5. [DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.7.321] [PMID]
Burnz N, Grovpe SK. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization. Amesterdam: Elsevier/Saunders; 2005. [Link]
Files
IssueVol 17 No 2 (2023) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v17i2.12416
Keywords
Constipation Questionnaire Validity Reliability Persian version

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Mahmoudzadeh T, Ghaderi F, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Sepehri B, Adigozali H. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Comprehensive Constipation Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study. jmr. 2023;17(2):181-187.