Research Article

Comprehension of Complex Structures by Persian-speaking Aphasics: The Role of Cognitive Load

Abstract

Introduction: So far, many studies have investigated the extent and nature of the grammatical deficit in aphasia. However, to the best of our knowledge, this research is the first in the Persian language to inspect the comprehension of patients with Broca’s aphasia on diverse syntactically complex structures.
Materials and Methods: To scrutinize the impact of task on aphasics’ performance, four age-, education- and gender-matched Persian-speaking patients with Broca’s aphasia were compared with their healthy matched controls regarding the two different tasks of grammatical judgment and figurine act-out task. The structures used to examine the subjects’ performance included agentive passive, subject cleft, object cleft, object relative clause, and object experiencer psychological verbs.
Results: Our results which supported the trade-off hypothesis, showed that our subjects generally performed better in grammatical judgment task than in figurine act-out task (P≤0.05). Particularly in the second task, as our inner task comparison, the patients’ problems were more severe in object cleft, object experiencer, and object relative clauses: all structures whose interpretations need more cognitive load.
Conclusion: Our findings put more weight on the interactive or constraint-based model of language processing.

Charles D, Olm C, Powers J, Ash S, Irwin DJ, McMillan CT, et al. Grammatical comprehension deficits in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2014; 85(3):249-56. [DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2013-305749] [PMID] [PMCID]

Edwards S. Grammar and fluent aphasia. In: Fava E, editor. Clinical Linguistics: Theory and Applications in Speech Pathology and Therapy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2002. pp. 249-66. [DOI:10.1075/cilt.227.20edw]

Garraffa M, Grillo N. Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2008; 21(2):177-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001]

Grossman M, Haberman S. Aphasics’ selective deficits in appreciating grammatical agreements. Brain and Language. 1982; 16(1):109-20. [DOI:10.1016/0093-934X(82)90075-X]

Thompson CK, Mack JE. Grammatical impairments in PPA. Aphasiology. 2014; 28(8-9):1018-37. [DOI:10.1080/02687038.2014.912744] [PMID] [PMCID]

Thompson CK, Cho S, Hsu CJ, Wieneke Ch, Rademaker A, Weitner BB, et al. Dissociations between fluency and agrammatism in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012; 26(1):20-43. [DOI:10.1080/02687038.2011.584691] [PMID] [PMCID]

Wulfeck B, Bates E. Differential sensitivity to errors of agreement and word order in Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1991; 3(3):258-72. [DOI:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.258] [PMID]

Bastiaanse R, Edwards S. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language. 2004; 89(1):91-107 [DOI:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00306-7]

Cornell TL, Fromkin VA, Mauner G. A linguistic approach to language processing in Broca’s aphasia: A paradox resolved. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1993; 2(2):47-52. [DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770692]

Fridriksson J, Morrow L. Cortical activation and language task difficulty in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2005; 19(3-5):239-50. [DOI:10.1080/02687030444000714] [PMID] [PMCID]

Friederici AD, Kilborn K. Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1989; 1(3):262-72. [DOI:10.1162/jocn.1989.1.3.262] [PMID]

Burchert F, Swoboda-Moll M, De Bleser R. Tense and agreement dissociations in German agrammatic speakers: Underspecification vs. hierarchy. Brain and Language. 2005; 94(2):188-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.006] [PMID]

Caramazza A, Capitani E, Rey A. Berndt RS. Agrammatic Broca’s aphasia is not associated with a single pattern of comprehension performance. Brain and Language. 2001; 76(2):158-84. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1999.2275] [PMID]

Grodzinsky Y. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(1):27-51. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1039] [PMID]

Hesketh A, Bishop DVM. Agrammatism and adaptation theory. Aphasiology. 1996; 10(1):49-80. [DOI:10.1080/02687039608248398]

Linebarger MC. Agrammatism as evidence about grammar. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(1):52-91. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1040] [PMID]

O’Grady W, Lee M. A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language. 2005; 92(1):91-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.009] [PMID]

O’Grady W, Lee M. The isomorphic mapping hypothesis: Evidence from Korean. Brain and Cognition. 2001; 46(1-2):226-30. [DOI:10.1016/S0278-2626(01)80072-5]

Fink RB. Mapping treatment: An approach to treating sentence level impairments in agrammatism. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders. 2001; 11(3):14-23. [DOI:10.1044/nnsld11.3.14]

Schwartz MF, Linebarger MC, Saffran EM. The status of the syntactic deficit theory of agrammatism. In: Kean ML, editor. Agrammatism. London: Academic Press; 1985. pp. 83-124. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50008-0]

Ito A. The interpretation of Japanese word order patterns by adult English-speaking learners of Japanese as a second language. Applied Linguistics. 2007; 28(3):466-73. [DOI:10.1093/applin/amm025]

Longobardi G. “Postverbal” subjects and the mapping hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry. 2000; 31(4):691-702. [DOI:10.1162/002438900554514]

Marshall J. The mapping hypothesis and aphasia therapy. Aphasiology. 1995; 9(6):517-39. [DOI:10.1080/02687039508248712]

Beretta A, Munn A. Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language. 1998; 65(3):404-21. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1998.1997] [PMID]

Grodzinsky Y. The trace deletion hypothesis and the tree-pruning hypothesis: Still valid characterizations of Broca’s aphasia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000; 23(1):55-64. [DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00582399]

Hickok G, Zurif E, Cansecogonzalez E. Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 1993; 45(3):371-95. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1993.1051] [PMID]

Rizzi L. Two notes on the linguistic interpretation of Broca’s aphasia. In: Kean ML, editor. Agrammatism. London: Academic Press; 1985. pp. 153-164. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50010-9]

Zurif E, Grodzinsky Y. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in agrammatic aphasics: A reply to Linebarger, Schwartz and Saffran. Cognition. 1983; 15(1-3):207-13. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90041-0]

Clifton Jr Ch, Frazier L. Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In: Carlson GN, Tanenhaus MK, editors. Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Vol. 7. Dordrecht: Springer; 1989. pp 273-317. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_8]

Frazier L. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1995; 24(6):437-68. [DOI:10.1007/BF02143161] [PMID]

Frazier L, Friederici A. On deriving the properties of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language. 1991; 40(1):51-66. [DOI:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90116-I]

Frazier L, Clifton Ch, Rayner K, Deevy P, Koh S, Bader M. Interface problems: Structural constraints on interpretation? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2005; 34(3):201-31. [DOI:10.1007/s10936-005-3638-1] [PMID] [PMCID]

Friederici AD. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language. 1995; 50(3):259-81. [DOI:10.1006/brln.1995.1048] [PMID]

Friederici AD, Frazier L. Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language. 1992; 42(1):1-29. [DOI:10.1016/0093-934X(92)90053-H]

Kilborn KW, Friederici AD. Cognitive penetrability of syntactic priming in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychology. 1994; 8(1):83-90. [DOI:10.1037/0894-4105.8.1.83]

Haarmann HJ. Agrammatic aphasia as a timing deficit. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information; 1993. https://books.google.com/books?id=1yjyAAAACAAJ&dq

Hahne A, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999; 11(2):194-205. [DOI:10.1162/089892999563328]

Harun M. Investigating the agrammatic production of canonical and non-canonical sentences cross-linguistically. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 2020; 11(1):6-16. [DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.6]

Mohapatra B. The contribution of cognition to the rehabilitation of language and communication deficits. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2020; 27(11):1-16. [DOI:10.12968/ijtr.2019.0098]

Karimi S. A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton; 2008. [DOI:10.1515/9783110199796]

Windfuhr GL Persian grammar: History and state of its study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 2011. https://books.google.com/books/about/Persian_Grammar.html?id=uVIEGjCL33wC

Mazdeh M, Yaghobi A. [The study of quality of life in aphasic stroke patients in university-medical centers of Hamedan (Persian)]. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2009; 3(1):21-8. http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-36-en.html

Nilipour R. Emerging issues in speech therapy in Iran. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2002; 54(2):65-8. [DOI:10.1159/000057916] [PMID]

Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1972. https://books.google.com/books?id=cf1rAAAAMAAJ&q

Tesak J, Code Ch. Milestones in the history of aphasia: Theories and protagonists. London: Psychology Press; 2008. [DOI:10.4324/9780203934869]

Ingram JCL. Neurolinguistics: An introduction to spoken language processing and its disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511618963]

Linebarger MC, Schwartz MF, Saffran EM. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition. 1983; 13(3):361-92. [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X]

Cupples L, Inglis AL. When task demands induce “asyntactic” comprehension: A study of sentence interpretation in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1993; 10(3):201-34. [DOI:10.1080/02643299308253461]

Files
IssueVol 15 No 4 (2021) QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v15i4.7743
Keywords
Aphasia Cognition Broca’s aphasia

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Azad O. Comprehension of Complex Structures by Persian-speaking Aphasics: The Role of Cognitive Load. jmr. 2021;15(4):227-238.