Mechanisms of Listening Effort in Individuals with Hearing Loss
Abstract
Introduction: Listening effort refers to the cognitive resources required to understand speech, particularly in challenging environments. Individuals with hearing loss experience increased listening effort due to auditory deficits, affecting their communication and cognitive load. Understanding the mechanisms underlying listening efforts is essential for developing effective hearing interventions. This study aims to explore the mechanisms underlying listening efforts in individuals with hearing impairments.
Materials and Methods: A narrative review was conducted using specific keywords in Google Scholar (as a search engine) and the research databases Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. Relevant articles were selected based on their alignment with the focus on the mechanisms of listening effort in individuals with hearing loss.
Results: Hearing loss triggers compensatory cognitive strategies, engaging the prefrontal regions and working memory to process degraded auditory signals. Neural adaptations, including cross-modal plasticity and reliance on top-down processing, further elevate mental workload. Degraded temporal processing and attentional demands in noisy environments exacerbate effort, often leading to fatigue.
Conclusion: Understanding these mechanisms informs interventions, such as adaptive hearing technologies, cognitive training to optimize resource allocation and personalized communication strategies. Integrating neurophysiological insights into clinical practice can reduce cognitive fatigue and enhance communication outcomes.
Amiri M, Mohammadi M, Razavi SZ, Abdollahi H, Pour Mobarakeh ZI. Normative data for speech-in-noise perception test in young adults with normal hearing: Gender and ear laterality effects. Auditory & Vestibular Research. 2023; 32(1):65-9. [DOI:10.18502/avr.v32i1.11323]
Gagne J-P, Besser J, Lemke U. Behavioral assessment of listening effort using a dual-task paradigm: A review. Trends in Hearing. 2017; 21:2331216516687287. [DOI:10.1177/2331216516687287] [PMID]
Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, Edwards B, Hornsby BWY, Humes LE, et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing. 2016; 37(Suppl 1):5S-27S. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312] [PMID]
Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, Lunner T. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology. 2008; 47(sup2):S99-105. [DOI:10.1080/14992020802301167] [PMID]
Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, Sörqvist P, Danielsson H, Lyxell B, et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2013; 7:31. [DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031]
Humes LE, Roberts L. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1990; 33(4):726-35. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.3304.726] [PMID]
McCoy SL, Tun PA, Cox LC, Colangelo M, Stewart RA, Wingfield A. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2005; 58(1):22-33. [DOI:10.1080/02724980443000151] [PMID]
Hällgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S. Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids: Comprensión del lenguaje en silencio y con ruido, con y sin auxiliares auditivos. International Journal of Audiology. 2005; 44(10):574-83. [DOI:10.1080/14992020500190011] [PMID]
Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1986; 29(2):146-54. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2902.146] [PMID]
Hopkins K, Moore BCJ, Stone MA. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2008; 123(2):1140-53. [DOI:10.1121/1.2824018] [PMID]
Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scandinavian Audiology. 1984;13(1):57-63. [DOI:10.3109/01050398409076258] [PMID]
Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V. Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends in Amplification. 2008; 12(4):283-99. [DOI:10.1177/1084713808325306] [PMID]
Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. Hearing impairment and social isolation in the elderly. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1982; 25(4):593-9. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2504.593] [PMID]
Demorest ME, Erdman SA. Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1986; 29(4):515-35. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.2904.535] [PMID]
Strawbridge WJ, Wallhagen MI, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA. Negative consequences of hearing impairment in old age: A longitudinal analysis. Gerontologist. 2000; 40(3):320-6. [DOI:10.1093/geront/40.3.320] [PMID]
Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Jansma EP, Wang Y, Naylor G, Lorens A, et al. Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort: A systematic review. Ear and Hearing. 2017; 38(3):267. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000396] [PMID]
Wingfield A, Tun PA, McCoy SL. Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2005; 14(3):144-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00356.x]
Pichora-Fuller MK. Perceptual effort and apparent cognitive decline: Implications for audiologic rehabilitation. Seminars in Hearing. 2006; 27(4):284-93. [DOI:10.1055/s-2006-954855]
Mahalawy T, Emara AA, Hussein AB, Lasheen RM. Listening effort in patients with sensorineural hearing loss using cochlear implant. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences. 2024; 25(25):1-9. [DOI:10.21608/ejentas.2022.140669.1516]
Mallard M, Van Engen KJ. Speech intelligibility and listening effort: A dual-task paradigm for accented speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2023; 153(3_supplement):A169. [DOI:10.1121/10.0018546]
Sardone R, Battista P, Panza F, Lozupone M, Griseta C, Castellana F, et al. The age-related central auditory processing disorder: Silent impairment of the cognitive ear. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019; 13:619. [DOI:10.3389/fnins.2019.00619] [PMID]
Janse E, Ernestus M. The roles of bottom-up and top-down information in the recognition of reduced speech: Evidence from listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Phonetics. 2011; 39(3):330-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.005]
Moore BCJ. Cochlear hearing loss: Physiological, psychological and technical issues. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. [DOI:10.1002/9780470987889]
MC K. I can hear what people say, but I can’t understand them. The Hearing Review. 1997; 4:8-14. [Link]
Peelle JE, Wingfield A. The neural consequences of age-related hearing loss. Trends in Neurosciences. 2016; 39(7):486-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.tins.2016.05.001] [PMID]
Alloway TP, Copello E. Working memory: The what, the why, and the how. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist. 2013; 30(2):105-18. [DOI:10.1017/edp.2013.13]
Akeroyd MA. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology. 2008; 47(sup2):S53-71. [DOI:10.1080/14992020802301142] [PMID]
Pichora‐Fuller MK, Schneider BA, Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1995; 97(1):593-608. [DOI:10.1121/1.412282] [PMID]
Manini B, Vinogradova V, Woll B, Cameron D, Eimer M, Cardin V. Sensory experience modulates the reorganisation of temporal auditory regions for executive processing. bioRxiv. 2021; 2002-21. [DOI:10.1101/2021.02.08.430248]
Glick H, Sharma A. Cross-modal plasticity in developmental and age-related hearing loss: Clinical implications. Hearing Research. 2017; 343:191-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.012] [PMID]
Lomber SG, Meredith MA, Kral A. Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nature Neuroscience. 2010; 13(11):1421-7. [DOI:10.1038/nn.2653] [PMID]
Francis AL, Love J. Listening effort: Are we measuring cognition or affect, or both? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science. 2020; 11(1):e1514. [DOI:10.1002/wcs.1514] [PMID]
Pichora-Fuller MK, Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification. 2006; 10(1):29-59. [DOI:10.1177/108471380601000103] [PMID]
Winn MB, Teece KH. Listening effort is not the same as speech intelligibility score. Trends in Hearing. 2021; 25:23312165211027690. [DOI:10.1177/23312165211027688] [PMID]
Peelle JE. Listening effort: How the cognitive consequences of acoustic challenge are reflected in brain and behavior. Ear and Hearing. 2018; 39(2):204. [DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494] [PMID]
Wingfield A, Tun PA, Koh CK, Rosen MJ. Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging. 1999; 14(3):380. [DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.380] [PMID]
Peelle JE, Johnsrude I, Davis MH. Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2010; 4:1735. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00051] [PMID]
Davis MH, Johnsrude IS. Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hearing Research. 2007; 229(1-2):132-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.014] [PMID]
Vaden KI, Kuchinsky SE, Cute SL, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR, Eckert MA. The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013; 33(48):18979-86. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1417-13.2013] [PMID]
Wild CJ, Yusuf A, Wilson DE, Peelle JE, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS. Effortful listening: The processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32(40):14010-21. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012] [PMID]
Erb J, Henry MJ, Eisner F, Obleser J. The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013; 33(26):10688-97. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4596-12.2013] [PMID]
Eckert MA, Menon V, Walczak A, Ahlstrom J, Denslow S, Horwitz A, et al. At the heart of the ventral attention system: The right anterior insula. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30(8):2530-41. [DOI:10.1002/hbm.20688] [PMID]
Duncan J. The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010; 14(4):172-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004] [PMID]
Wingfield A, Grossman M. Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2006; 96(6):2830-9. [DOI:10.1152/jn.00628.2006] [PMID]
Pouyandeh MH, Hoseinabadi R. Factors influencing the hearing aids use and satisfaction: A review study. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2019; 13(3):137. [DOI:10.32598/JMR.13.3.137]
| Issue | Vol 19 No 3 (2025) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v19i3.19085 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Listening effort Hearing loss Cognitive load Mechanisms | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
