Research Article

Anxiety, Mobility, Disability and Proprioception in Adults with Mild Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Background. Studies on subclinical neck pain (SCNP), known as mild pain, are lacking in literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in anxiety, neck movement, disability, and proprioception in people with chronic SCNP (12 females and 4 males, Age: 28.1±4.0) and people without neck pain (17 females and 6 males, Age: 25.8±3.1).

Background. Studies on subclinical neck pain (SCNP), known as mild pain, are lacking in literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in anxiety, neck movement, disability, and proprioception in people with chronic SCNP (12 females and 4 males, Age: 28.1±4.0) and people without neck pain (17 females and 6 males, Age: 25.8±3.1).

Methods. A cross-sectional study with thirty nine participants was conducted. Participants were instructed to score their pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) (pain group: <4/10 and normal group: 0/10), anxiety level with the State-Trait anxiety inventory (STAI), and neck disability with the neck disability index (NDI). In addition, active range of motion (AROM) and joint position error (JPE) were assessed in participants of both groups.

Results. There was no significant difference in mean baseline characteristics between the two groups. Participants in the pain group reported significantly higher median NDI (p=<0.001) and higher mean current STAI_S (p=0.032) scores than participants with no pain. No significant differences in mean flexion, extension, lateral flexion right, lateral flexion left, rotation right, or rotation left were found between groups (p=0.95, p=0.68, p=0.29, p=0.59, p=0.70, and p=0.17, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in mean cervical spine joint position error flexion, extension, rotation right, and rotation left by study group (p=0.65, p=0.33, p=0.26, and p=0.23 respectively.
Conclusion. SCNP can substantially influence functional ability and anxiety levels, especially among students in higher education institutions dealing with additional stressors. The interaction between pain intensity, disability, and anxiety underscores the potential for a detrimental feedback loop, underscoring the significance of early intervention.
Methods. A cross-sectional study with thirty nine participants was conducted. Participants were instructed to score their pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) (pain group: <4/10 and normal group: 0/10), anxiety level with the State-Trait anxiety inventory (STAI), and neck disability with the neck disability index (NDI). In addition, active range of motion (AROM) and joint position error (JPE) were assessed in participants of both groups.
Results. There was no significant difference in mean baseline characteristics between the two groups. Participants in the pain group reported significantly higher median NDI (p=<0.001) and higher mean current STAI_S (p=0.032) scores than participants with no pain. No significant differences in mean flexion, extension, lateral flexion right, lateral flexion left, rotation right, or rotation left were found between groups (p=0.95, p=0.68, p=0.29, p=0.59, p=0.70, and p=0.17, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in mean cervical spine joint position error flexion, extension, rotation right, and rotation left by study group (p=0.65, p=0.33, p=0.26, and p=0.23 respectively.
Conclusion. SCNP can substantially influence functional ability and anxiety levels, especially among students in higher education institutions dealing with additional stressors. The interaction between pain intensity, disability, and anxiety underscores the potential for a detrimental feedback loop, underscoring the significance of early intervention.

[1] GBD 2021 Neck Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain, 1990-2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024;6(3):e142-e155. https://doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00321-1.
[2] Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, et al. Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4
[3] Sang D, Xiao B, Rong T, et al. Depression and anxiety in cervical degenerative disc disease: Who are susceptible?. Front Public Health. 2023;10:1002837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002837
[4] International Association for the Study of Pain. Terminology. https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/#pain. (Accessed 28 May 2023)
[5] Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg.2003;97(2):534-540. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E
[6] George SZ, Greenspan AI. Nonpharmacological management of pain: convergence in priorities fuels the drive for more evidence. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):287–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy034
[7] Haavik H, Murphy B. Subclinical neck pain and the effects of cervical manipulation on elbow joint position sense. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34(2):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.12.009
[8] Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Bae SS. Proprioception and rotation range sensitization associated with subclinical neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):E60–E67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000152160.28052.a2
[9] Daligadu J, Haavik H, Yielder PC, Baarbe J, Murphy B. Alterations in cortical and cerebellar motor processing in subclinical neck pain patients following spinal manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013;36(8):527-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.08.003
[10] Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2014;155(12):2545–2550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014
[11] Rhudy JL, Meagher MW. Fear and anxiety: divergent effects on human pain thresholds. Pain. 2000;84(1):65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00183-9
[12] Paulus I, Brumagne S. Altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in persons with subclinical recurrent neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(6):426–432. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0189
[13] Karellas AM, Yielder P, Burkitt JJ, McCracken HS, Murphy BA. The Influence of Subclinical Neck Pain on Neurophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Multisensory Integration. Brain Sci. 2019;9(12):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9120362
[14] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6736a2.htm. (accessed 27 September 2023)
[15] Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384
[16] Bellew JW. Michlovitz's Modalities for Therapeutic Intervention. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2022, 356.
[17] Alghamdi MS, Alghamdi AF, Almalawi AM, et al. The Association Between Neck Pain and Psychological Distress Experienced by King Abdulaziz University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35685. https://doi: 10.7759/cureus.35685.
[18] Elbinoune I, Amine B, Shyen S, Gueddari S, Abouqal R, Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Chronic neck pain and anxiety-depression: prevalence and associated risk factors. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:89. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.24.89.8831
[19] Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018;11:851-856. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S158847
[20] Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring with a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3):e088. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088.
[21] Young IA, Dunning J, Butts R, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Psychometric properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index in patients with cervicogenic headache. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(1):44-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418772584
[22] Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S467-S472. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20561
[23] Metzger R. A reliability and validity study of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1976;32(2):276-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<276::AID-JCLP2270320215>3.0.CO;2-G
[24] Spielberger C. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (rev. ed.). Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
[25] Guillén-Riquelme A, Buela-Casal G. [Meta-analysis of group comparison and meta-analysis of reliability generalization of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (STAI)]. Rev Esp de Salud Publica. 2014;88(1):101-112. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1135-57272014000100007.
[26] Jones C, Sterling M. Clinimetrics: Neck Disability Index. J Physiother. 2021;67(2):144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.001.
[27] NORAXON. Available at: https://www.noraxon.com. (accessed 31 May 2023)
[28] Heuvelmans P, Benjaminse A, Bolt R, Baumeister J, Otten E, Gokeler A. Concurrent validation of the Noraxon MyoMotion wearable inertial sensors in change-of-direction and jump-landing tasks. Sports Biomech. 2022;3:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2022.2093264.
[29] Balasubramanian S. Comparison of angle measurements between Vicon and Myomotion systems. 2013. Arizona State University.
[30] Donaldson B, Bezodis N, Bayne H. Within-subject repeatability and between-subject variability in posture during calibration of an inertial measurement unit system. ISBS. 2021;39(1):224-227.
[31] MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):400-417. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
[32] Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
[33] Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-415. PMID: 1834753
[34] Butera KA, Fox EJ, George SZ. Toward a Transformed Understanding: From Pain and Movement to Pain with Movement. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1503-1507. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20160211.
[35] Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3):376-82. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.30623
[36] Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9(10):802-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002
[37] Karacaoglu M, Meijer S, Peerdeman KJ, et al. Susceptibility to Nocebo Hyperalgesia, Dispositional Optimism, and Trait Anxiety as Predictors of Nocebo Hyperalgesia Reduction. Clin J Pain. 2023;39(6):259-269. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001112.
[38] Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M. New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron. 2008;59(2):195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.030. PMID: 18667148.
[39] Quartey J, Ernst M, Bello A, et al. Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals. S Afr J Physiother. 2019;75(1):568. https://doi:10.4102/sajp.v75i1.568
[40] Beltran-Alacreu H, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Calvo-Lobo C, et al. Prediction models of health-related quality of life in different neck pain conditions: a cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:657-666. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S162702
[41] Mleziva P, Johnson EG, Lohman E, Jaber M, Mleziva L, Daher NS. Effects of Electrotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, Mobility, and Proprioception in Young Adults with Mild Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2024;13:274-284.
IssueArticles in Press QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Subclinical neck pain; Anxiety; Proprioception; Neck mobility

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Mleziva P, Johnson E, Lohman E, Jaber M, Mleziva L, Daher N. Anxiety, Mobility, Disability and Proprioception in Adults with Mild Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. jmr. 2025;(-).