Journal of Modern Rehabilitation 2016. 10(3):139-143.

Evaluation of Activities of Daily Living Instruments in Cardiac Patients: Narrative Review
Zeinab Fathipour-Azar, Malahat Akbarfahimi, Behnoosh Vasaghi-Gharamaleki, Nasim Naderi

Abstract


Introduction: The evaluation of assessment instruments through activity of daily living (ADL) in heart disease is done for early intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate the proper instrument for assessing ADL in a cardiac patient.
Material and Methods: This study was a narrative review of instruments of screening and assessing ADL in heart disease. A search was conducted using databases including Iran Medex, SID, Mag Iran, Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. The instruments were investigated regarding the date of publishing, each activity of ADL, number of items, method of administration/format, parameters used for establishing target intervention outcomes, scoring, time duration of each instrument, and psychometric properties.
Results: From 22 instruments, eight instruments met the criteria and were included. These instruments were all in the form of self-report questionnaire or observation. Among the available instruments, the oldest instrument was invented in 1957 (PULSES Profile) and the most recent one was developed in 2009 [performance measure for ADL (PMADL)-8]. In terms of item, minimum and maximum items for implementation of instrument were listed 8 and 170 for PMADL-8 and Klein-Bell index, respectively. The minimum and maximum administration time duration was 4-6 min (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) and 60 min (Klein-Bell index).
Conclusion: This study found that some instruments have been used more because of their proficiency subscales in recent years. Furthermore, a comparison of recent and old instruments revealed their evolutionary path. There is a serious lack of proper instrument for ADL evaluation of occupational therapists.
Keywords: Questionnaire; Evaluation; Heart disease; Activity of daily living

Keywords


Questionnaire; Evaluation; Heart disease; Activity of daily living

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yousefi P, Sabzevari S, Mohammad Alizadeh S, Haghdoost A. Study of quality of life in heart failure hospitalized patients in Kerman medical university hospital in 2008. Iran J Nurs Res 2011; 6 (21): 59-67. [In Persin].

Seyam S, Heidarnia AR, Tavafian SS. Quality of life and factors related to it in cardiovascular patients after heart surgery. J Birjand Univ Med Sci 2013; 19 (6): 33-41. [n Persian].

Jahani A, Rejeh N, Heravi-Karimooi M, Hadavi A, Zayeri F, Khatooni AR. The relationship between spiritual health and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Islam Life Center Health 2013; 1(2); 17-21.

Garcia S, Alosco ML, Spitznagel MB, Cohen R, Raz N, Sweet L, et al. Cardiovascular fitness associated with cognitive performance in heart failure patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2013; 13: 29.

Yamada S, Shimizu Y, Suzuki M, Izumi T. Functional limitations predict the risk of

rehospitalization among patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J 2012; 76(7): 1654-61.

Lapier TK. Utility of the late life function and disability instrument as an outcome measure in patients participating in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: a preliminary study. Physiother Can 2012; 64(1): 53-62.

Shojaei F. Quality of life in patients with heart failure. Hayat 2008; 14 (2): 5-13. [In Persian].

Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 43(8): 522-8.

James AB. Activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. In: Willard HS, Schell BAB, editors. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014.

Cole B, Finch E, Gowland C, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. 3rd ed. Toronto, ON: Williams and Wilkins; 1995.

Furphy KA. Assessments of activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. In: Asher IE, editor. Occupational therapy assessment tools: An annotated index. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) Press; 2007.

Fasoli S. Assessing roles and competence. In: Radomski MA, Trombly CA, editors. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013.

Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73(2): 188-90.

Kono Y, Yamada S, Iwatsu K, Nitobe S, Tanaka Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Predictive value of functional limitation for disease severity in patients with mild chronic heart failure. J Cardiol 2012; 60(5): 411-5.

Garet M, Barthelemy JC, Degache F, Costes F, Da-Costa A, Isaaz K, et al. A questionnaire-based assessment of daily physical activity in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6(5): 577-84.

Schultz-Krohn W. Assessments of occupational performance. In: Asher IE, editor. Occupational therapy assessment tools: An annotated index. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) Press; 2007.

Law M. Self-care. 1st ed. In: Van Deusen J, Brunt D, editors. Assessment in occupational therapy and physical therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1997.

Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35(5): 1245-55.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.