Journal of Modern Rehabilitation 2016. 10(1):13-17.

Design and Fabrication a Pneumatic Suspension System in Transtibial Supracondylar Prosthesis and its Effect on Residual Limb Pistoning
SeyedehZahra Anousheh, Behnam Hajiaghaei, Hassan Saeedi, Hossein Gholizadeh

Abstract


Introduction: Transtibial amputation is the most common amputation in lower limbs. Volume loss of residual limb occurs during daily use of prostheses, which results in pistoning between residual limb and prosthetic socket. The goal of this study was to design and fabricate a pneumatic suspension system in transtibial supracondylar prostheses and to evaluate its effect on residual limb pistoning.
Material and Methods: Five unilateral transtibial amputees were participated in this study. After designing and fabricating pneumatic  suspension system,  its  effect  on  residual  limb pistoning was evaluated using photographic method in five static stages including full weight bearing, semi weight bearing, non-weight bearing, 30 N and 50 N loads.
Results: Residual limb pistoning was reduced using pneumatic suspension system during non- weight bearing, 30 N and 50 N static loading.
Conclusion:   The   use   of   pneumatic   suspension   system   would   reduce pistoning   in supracondylar transtibial prostheses.


Keywords


Transtibial supracondylar prostheses; Prosthetic suspension; Pistoning (vertical movement)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Smith DG, Michael JW, Bowker JH. Atlas ofAmputations and limb deficiencies: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;2004.

Lusardi MM. Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007.

Eshraghi A, Abu Osman NA, Gholizadeh H, Ali S, Saevarsson SK, Wan Abas WA. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)2013; 28(1): 55-60.

Yigiter K, Sener G, Bayar K. Comparison of the effects of patellar tendon bearing and total surface bearing sockets on prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26(3):206-12.

Klute GK, Berge JS, Biggs W, Pongnumkul S, Popovic Z, Curless B. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(10): 1570-5.

Baars EC, Geertzen JH. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005;29(1): 27-37.

Goh JC, Lee PV, Chong SY. Stump/socket pressure profiles of the pressure cast prosthetic socket. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18(3):237-43.

Datta D, Vaidya SK, Howitt J, Gopalan L.Outcome of fitting an ICEROSS prosthesis: views of trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(2): 111-5.

Grevsten S, Erikson U. A roentgenological study of the stump-socket contact and skeletal displacement in the PTB-Suciton Prosthesis. Ups J Med Sci 1975; 80(1): 49-57.

Wirta RW, Golbranson FL, Mason R, Calvo K.Analysis of below-knee suspension systems: effect on gait. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27(4): 385-96.

Kapp S. Suspension systems for prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (361): 55-62.

Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, Ali S, Razak NA. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014; 29(1): 87-97.

Boonstra AM, van Duin W, Eisma W.International forum-Silicone Suction Socket (3S)versus supracondylar PTB prosthesis with pelite liner: transtibial amputees' preferences. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1996; 8(3): 96-9.

Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, Ali S, Saevarsson SK, Wan Abas WA, et al. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012;49(9): 1321-30.

Klute GK, Glaister BC, Berge JS. Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010; 34(2): 146-53.

Coleman KL, Boone DA, Laing LS, Mathews DE, Smith DG. Quantification of prosthetic outcomes:elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41(4):591-602.

Gholizadeh H, Osman NA, Kamyab M, Eshraghi A, Abas WA, Azam MN. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In((R)) X5 and Dermo((R)) Liner using motion analysis system. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27(1): 34-9.

Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Luviksdottir A, Eshraghi A, Kamyab M, Wan Abas WA. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35(4): 360-4.

Gholizadeh H, Osman NA, Luoviksdottir A, Kamyab M, Eshraghi A, Ali S. A new method for measuring pistoning in lower limb prosthetic. Proceedings of the 5th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2011;2011 Jun 20-23; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2016.

Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Kamyab M, Eshraghi A, Luviksdottir AG, Wan Abas WA. Clinical evaluation of two prosthetic suspension systems in a bilateral transtibial amputee. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91(10): 894-8.

Brunelli S, Delussu AS, Paradisi F, Pellegrini R, Traballesi M. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal- In(R) X5 in transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37(6): 436-44.

Board WJ, Street GM, Caspers C. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25(3): 202-9.

Tanner JE, Berke GM. Radiographic comparison of vertical tibial translation using two types of suspensions on a transtibial prosthesis: a case study. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 2001;13(1): 14-6.

Eshraghi A, Abu Osman NA, Karimi MT, Gholizadeh H, Ali S, Wan Abas WA. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91(12): 1028-38.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.