Comparing Neurocognitive Parameters Between Women With Lumbar Hyperlordosis and Normal Women

  • JMR Office
  • Sara Fereydounnia Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Azadeh Shadmehr Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Saba Salemi Student Research Committee, School of Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Keywords: Visual reaction time, Auditory reaction time, Anticipatory skill, Lumbar hyperlordosis

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of lumbar hyperlordosis is high in young women. Considering the previous studies on the role of neuro-cognitive skills in preventing musculoskeletal injuries, the goal of the present study was to examine these skills in women with lumbar hyperlordosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 women with normal lumbar lordosis and 15 women with lumbar hyperlordosis participated in this study. Measurements of the visual and auditory reaction time and anticipatory skills were performed by using Speed Anticipation Reaction Time (SART) test. The Independent t-test was used to compare between two groups.Results: The distribution of all variables in both groups was normal, according to the result of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The participants of our study had no pain, movement limitations or disability. Our study results were not consistent with the findings of previous studies in this topic. It is suggested that in the future studies the individuals with severe malalignments (that affected their lifestyle) be assessed to clarify the reason for these discrepancies among study results.

References

Been E, Kalichman L. Lumbar lordosis. The Spine Journal. 2014; 14(1):87-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.464] [PMID]
Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, Rodgers M, Romani WA. Muscles: Testing and Function, with Posture and Pain (Kendall, Muscles): Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Nazarian A, Daneshjoo A, Ghorbani L, Ghaedi H. The prevalence of lordotic and kyphotic deformities among different age groups. Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2010; 5(1):24-32.
Luoto S, Taimela S, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Mechanisms explaining the association between low back trouble and deficits in information processing: A controlled study with follow-up. Spine. 1999; 24(3):255-61. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199902010-00011] [PMID]
Swanik CB, Covassin T, Stearne DJ, Schatz P. The relationship between neurocognitive function and noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007; 35(6):943-8. [DOI:10.1177/0363546507299532] [PMID]
Luoto S, Hurri L, Alaranta H. Reaction time in patients with chronic low-back pain. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 1995; 5:47-50.
Taimela S, Osterman K, Alaranta H, Soukka A, Kujala U. Long psychomotor reaction time in patients with chronic low-back pain: Preliminary report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993; 74(11):1161-4. [PMID]
Taimela S, Kujala UM. Reaction times with reference to musculoskeletal complaints in adolescence. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1992; 75(3_suppl):1075-82. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1992.75.3f.1075] [PMID]
Gabbett T, Rubinoff M, Thorburn L, Farrow D. Testing and training anticipation skills in softball fielders. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2007; 2(1):15-24. [DO:10.1260/174795407780367159]
Youdas JW, Suman VJ, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of lumbar spine sagittal mobility obtained with the flexible curve. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1995; 21(1):13-20. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.1995.21.1.13] [PMID]
Shadmehr A, Ashnagar Z. The study of validity and reliability of speed anticipation reaction test. Modern Rehabilitation. [In press].
Ashnagar Z, Shadmehr A, Jalaei S. The effects of acute bout of cycling on auditory & visual reaction times. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2015; 19(2):268-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.05.003] [PMID]
Luoto S, Taimela S, Hurri H, Aalto H, Pyykkö I, Alaranta H. Psychomotor speed and postural control in chronic low back pain patients: A controlled follow-up study. Spine. 1996; 21(22):2621-7. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199611150-00012] [PMID]
Shadmehr A, Padash H, Arsalan S. Neurocognitive abilities in soccer athletes are different from healthy non-athletes subjects. Iraq Medical Journal. 2017; 1(2):37-40.
Shadmehr A, Khademolhosseini N, Bagheri H, Jalaei S. Reaction time and anticipatory skill of overhead athletes with and without scapular dyskinesia. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal. 2014; 4(2):96-101.
Knapp B. Skill in sport: The attainment of proficiency. Abingdon: Routledge; 1963.
Frith C, Dolan R. The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions. Cognitive Brain research. 1996; 5(1-2):175-81. [DOI:10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00054-7]
Fuster JM. Frontal lobe and cognitive development. Journal of Neurocytology. 2002; 31(3-5):373-85. [DOI:10.1023/A:1024190429920] [PMID]
Ebersbach G, Dimitrijevic MR, Poewe W. Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: A dual-task approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1995; 81(1):107-13. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1995.81.1.107] [PMID]
Galton F. Exhibition of instruments (1) for testing perception of differences of tint, and (2) for determining reaction-time. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1890; 19:27-9. [DOI:10.2307/2842529]
Welford A. Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In: Welford A, (editor), Reaction Times. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 1980.
Published
2019-01-09
How to Cite
1.
Office J, Fereydounnia S, Shadmehr A, Salemi S. Comparing Neurocognitive Parameters Between Women With Lumbar Hyperlordosis and Normal Women. jmr. 12(2):89-6.
Section
Research Article(s)