Correlation of INECO Frontal Screening With Verbal Fluency Tasks and MMSE in Persian Healthy Population

  • Fatemeh Satarian Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4148
  • Azar Mehri Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-7909
  • Shohreh Jalaie Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Neuropsychology, Executive function, Verbal fluency, Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE), Validity

Abstract

Introduction: INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a brief sensitive screening tool able to detect executive dysfunctions. IFS-P is the Persian version of IFS. This study aimed to investigate and analyze the correlation between IFS-P test with cognitive and executive function tests. We seek to investigate whether these tests can replace each other.Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, IFS-P was administered to 50 healthy people along with other executive assessments such as phonological verbal fluency (letters A, S and F), semantic verbal fluency (animals, fruits and verbs), and a global cognitive efficiency test (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]). The Spearman coefficient test was used to investigate the correlation between IFS-P and other executive and general cognitive tests.Results: The obtained results show no significant correlations between the IFS-P and the other cognitive instruments such as MMSE test. However, IFS-P correlates with verbal fluency tasks (semantic and phonological) in healthy people. Specifically, the correlation between IFS-P total score and other tests are as follows: for MMSE, r=0.20 (P=0.10); for/F/phonological verbal fluency, r=0.36(P=0.00); for/S/phonological verbal fluency, r=0.44 (P=0.00); for/A/phonological verbal fluency, r=0.35 (P=0.00); for fruits semantic verbal fluency, r=0.30, (P=0.00); for animals semantic verbal fluency, r=0.38 (P=0.00); and for verbs semantic verbal fluency, r=0.56, (P=0.00).Conclusion: IFS-P is a brief, sensitive, and specific tool for the detection of executive dysfunction associated with neurodegenerative diseases. IFS-P correlates with the verbal fluency and does not correlate with the MMSE and cannot be replaced by them. Based on the results, we suggest that all three tests be used together.

References

Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Lopez P, Manes F. INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): A brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia–corrected version. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2009; 15(5):777-86. [DOI:10.1017/S1355617709990415] [PMID]
Ihnen J, Antivilo A, Muoz Neira C, Slachevsky A. [Chilean version of the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS-Ch): Psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy (Spanish)]. Dementia & Neuropsychologia. 2013; 7(1):40-7. [DOI:10.1590/S1980-57642013DN70100007] [PMID] [PMCID]
Satarian F, Mehri A, Jalali Sh. Validity and reliability of INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) in Persian dementia patients. (In press).
Wanda W, Adler R, Love R. Neurology for the speech-language pathologist. Virginia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
Marshall GA, Rentz DM, Frey MT, Locascio JJ, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, et al. Executive function and instrumental activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011; 7(3):300-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.04.005] [PMID] [PMCID]
Baudic S, Dalla Barba G, Thibaudet MC, Smagghe A, Remy P, Traykov L. Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer’s disease and their relations with episodic memory. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2006; 21(1):15-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.002] [PMID]
Royall DR, Lauterbach EC, Cummings JL, Reeve A, Rummans TA, Kaufer DI, et al. Executive control function: A review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the committee on research of the american neuropsychiatric association. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2002; 14(4):377-405. [DOI:10.1176/jnp.14.4.377] [PMID]
Chan RC, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen EY. Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2008; 23(2):201-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010] [PMID]
Crawford JR. Introduction to the assessment of attention and executive functioning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1998; 8(3):209-11. [DOI:10.1080/713755574]
Satarian F, Ghoreishi Z, Jalaei S. A review of common and quick tests in executive function in adults with neurological disorder. Advances in Biosciences & Clinical Medicine. 2017; 25. [DOI:10.7575/aiac.abcmed.ca1.25]
Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Valizadeh L, Jalaie S. Validation of a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the Persian population: A pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology. 2010; 17(3):190-5. [DOI:10.1080/09084282.2010.499773] [PMID]
Tombaugh TN, Kozak J, Rees L. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1999; 14(2):167-77. [doi:10.1093/arclin/14.2.167]
Published
2018-02-01
How to Cite
1.
Satarian F, Mehri A, Jalaie S. Correlation of INECO Frontal Screening With Verbal Fluency Tasks and MMSE in Persian Healthy Population. jmr. 12(1):21-0.
Section
Research Article(s)